ironwood: (Default)
ɪʀᴏɴᴡᴏᴏᴅ ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ ᴇsʜᴀɪ ([personal profile] ironwood) wrote in [community profile] tushanshu_ooc2013-07-20 10:39 pm
Entry tags:

Event HMD | Powerdown & Malicant Plot | June 16th - July 13th

As before, and for anyone who may have missed it, at the end of every mod-run event in Tu Shanshu, we try to toss up an open dialogue post so that the events can be discussed. This is mostly to see if everybody's as happy as possible with the direction the game is going, whether or not the events could be considered a hit or a miss, that sort of thing.

This particular HMD covers the Meta Power Reduction & Malicant joint event.

What are we looking for?
Feedback of all sorts! Did you like what happened? Did the event run too fast, or too slow? Were you able to feel like your character contributed or made a impact on the event? Would you like to make more of a difference? Has there been too much 'downtime' for the characters, do you have any suggestions to make about future events, etc etc? Did the event run long enough for you? Would you like to see more NPC-driven events, or less? Did you feel that there was enough for combatants and non-combatants alike to participate in?

OBVIOUSLY if you have more comments, questions or concerns than those listed above you can add those as well! This is pretty much just a general list.

Do we already have a focus?
In part, yes. We've identified the following issues with the event and would love to foster discussion on these points:
> Team Structure
There were some players that had multiple characters assigned to a team and others that volunteered and did not make the final teams. This was an oversight on Alex's part and she apologises! That said, do you have any suggestions on how we could avoid such an oversight in the future? Should we limit sign-ups to one character per player?

> Multiple Options
Each team was asked to pick only one option per clue set regardless of their characters' proclivities towards exploring multiple options. This was to reduce administrative workload and tie-in with the reduction of powers. Do you have any suggestions as to how we could make taking multiple options feasible for any future event structured in this way?

Note: Alex here! One option considered and taken off the table would be preparing all of the possible branches off the options and clues before the event starts. This is because I found creating the sets during the event really allowed me to adapt the scenarios to suit the actions of each team in a really organic fashion. In summary, it let the characters further influence the event rather than being stuck on rails (see: swizard). I'd really prefer to find a solution that allowed mid-event creation of the clues without sacrificing the multiple options, tbqh.

> Outcomes
The pre-event survey concluded that players were okay with getting dead-ends for their characters actions and so this was included. Two teams had a major impact on the health of the turtle and a variety had other impacts that lessened Malicant's grip on Keeliai. Do you think we should have included more largescale impacts? Less? More impacts in general? More complete dead ends?

We'd like to emphasize that any and all feedback is welcomed and encouraged! These are merely some areas that we've identified as concerns from our standpoint and would like to hear your thoughts on.

Do we have a form?
Yes, in fact! This time, we're offering a quick text form to help provide some structure to the feedback received. This form addresses some of the concerns we noted on a mod level and tries to give as much freedom as possible to anyone that chooses to use it. Please note that you do NOT have to use this form! It's provided as an option only. :3



Please remember, ANON IS ON for this and IP LOGGING IS OFF so if you have anything you'd like to say but maybe you're more comfortable putting it forth anon that is a-okay! You can also feel free to PM us at this journal, or to toss a private plurk at either of the mod accounts (those being [plurk.com profile] vonnerdyce or [plurk.com profile] reignsdown) if that suits your fancy. Any and all comments are welcome, and though participation in this meme isn't required it's definitely encouraged if you're up for it.

Thanks again, guys, and happy turtling!
poeticverses: (Contemplating Poetry)

[personal profile] poeticverses 2013-07-21 07:42 pm (UTC)(link)
It seemed like the independents were just too open ended in some cases, with too much being left up to the players coordinating it. That worked fine for Bruce and the power things, but like Sadie's group was investigating the Water sector and I'm still not sure what all went down because it was just too vague and I'm not sure who to ask about that, Kiki or the mods. Kiki's character started it, but it was plot related and it wasn't clear who was in charge. Maybe it was because that group had I think six people poking around. It just got too unweidly, which obviously isn't anyone's fault but is why I think side things should be limited to groups of two or three, tops. The write-ups were fine! I understood what they were looking into and what they might find. I just dunno how it all ended.

As for things like team seven, I think if something like that happens again it might be best to do some OOC planning towards the end. Like, "okay, you guys get the big one, this is what's going to happen in general, do you have anything in specific you want done to your muse" and have that specific thing be sort of an end goal so even if the threads aren't done by plot end the players at least have that one thing to react to when all is said and done. That way it still allows for whatever to happen, but it doesn't hold up reactions post-plot. I'd suggest this only for Really Big Things, like team seven, though. Everything else seemed to work perfectly fine!

Really, those two things were all I really had anything to say about, aside from what you guys already caught and the rationing/reduction frustration. This plot was seriously awesome and you guys really handled it a lot better than others might have.